At 01:17 PM 3/28/2007, Ted Davis wrote:
>The pattern here, perhaps inspired by the polarization of political
>media personalities in a post-modern age, is as follows: when you
>don't __like__ the larger implications (political, religious,
>cultural) that __some people__ are drawing from specific scientific
>conclusions, you go out and generate your own "science" instead of
>questioning the links that people are making with the generally
>accepted science. Go find your own "truth," as it were. ..."
@ You may want to re-think your conclusion - at least as far as it
relates to where I'm coming from.
It has nothing to do with what I don't "like". It has EVERYTHING to
do with the fact that the way I think and the way "_some other people
think_" is like night and day (polar opposite) - regardless of the
subject (political, religious, cultural).
Therefore I will reject as invalid and moot, any and all opinions of
those _"some people"_ to the degree that they show evidence of
"thinking" like those described
here: http://www.heritage.org/Press/Events/ev030507a.cfm
These "polar-opposite-from me-thinkers" are also succinctly described
in this book:
http://www.amazon.com/Closing-American-Mind-Allan-Bloom/dp/0671657151
~ Janice ... If you ever see me attempting to "reason" with such
"thinkers", or with those who are naive enough to trust their
opinions, please have me committed - I will have lost my mind.:)
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Wed Mar 28 14:45:19 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 28 2007 - 14:45:19 EDT