Would Janice be willing to defend the paper or will she run away from
a scientific analysis of the relevancy of this 'paper'?
At first glance, the 'paper' repeats some common mistakes made by
global warming deniers. But I would hate to waste my time if Janice
disowns the paper the moment its scientific vacuity has been revealed?
Are you interested Janice?
Let's start with
I wrote earlier on Zbigniew Jaworowski's piece claiming that
measurements of pre-industrial CO2 were wrong. Now Jim Easter has
written a masterful post, detailing twenty-two false or misleading
statements made by Jaworowski. Go and read, it's beautiful work.
http://timlambert.org/2005/05/jaworowski/
And I raise you
http://timlambert.org/2005/01/hissink3/
and
http://www.someareboojums.org/blog/?p=7
http://www.someareboojums.org/blog/
http://www.someareboojums.org/blog/?cat=1
Good luck. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news Janice.
Pim
On 3/25/07, Janice Matchett <janmatch@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> New paper just out. ~ Janice
>
> CO2: The Greatest Scientific Scandal of Our Time
> by Zbigniew Jaworowski, M.D., Ph.D., D.Sc., March 2007
> http://www.warwickhughes.com/icecore/
>
>
>
>
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Mon Mar 26 00:51:50 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 00:51:50 EDT