On 3/13/07, Janice Matchett <janmatch@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> At 05:02 AM 3/13/2007, Michael Roberts wrote:
>
> ...*John convinced me of global warming some 10 years ago* and I get
> impatient with those who don't want to see the problem. ~ Michael
>
>
> *@ *If I hoped to have any credibility with those capable of rational
> thought, I wouldn't run around bragging about being convinced by the
> "arguments" of 60's - type - radical / alarmist-zealots preaching stuff
> like this
>
> *QUOTE: *"Unless we announce disasters no one will listen .. Global
> warming is now a weapon of mass destruction. It kills more people than
> terrorism.." ~ Sir John Houghton, first chairman of IPCC Monday July 28,
> 2003 http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,93466,00.html
>
> You may want to reconsider and take Burgy's advice about those who
> deliberately peddle junk science in order to scare people into accepting
> their agenda:
>
Indeed, so why do we still see this kind of junk science denying the fact of
global warming? And why do we see ad hominem attacks time after time when
the science is shown to be flawed?
Janice, you are doing a great service to the community by allowing us to
evaluate and reject the flawed arguments by global warming deniers who are
indeed peddling junk science.
It may be time to update some of the debunked arguments but really, there
are few if any remaining arguments from global warming deniers which deserve
this.
The Channel 4 infomercial on global warming has more than provided for the
remaining arguments and they are easily and quickly dismissable as junk.
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Tue Mar 13 14:16:33 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 13 2007 - 14:16:33 EDT