"Structuralist analysis is generally ahistorical, systems-oriented, and non-evolutionary (not anti-evolutionary). Both creationism and neo-Darwinism are, in contrast, emphatically historicist with one positing extreme polyphyly (de novo creation of species) and the other radical monophyly (common descent). "
Interesting stuff. My question for you is, what is wrong with this? Often, it seems, that the truth lies between two extremes.
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sun Mar 11 09:14:04 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Mar 11 2007 - 09:14:04 EDT