Re: [asa] Physicalism and Incarnation

It is possible to speak in some ways of "bodily resurrection" without "physical resurrection" but if one believes that the tomb was empty (as Wright does) then the physical body of Jesus was involved in whatever the resurrection was. "Resuscitation" would be essentially the return of Jesus' body to its condition before death. OTOH resurrection as Paul speaks of it in I Cor.15 means transformation of the "physical body" into a "spiritual body," not some process which bypasses the physical.

Shalom
George
http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Robert Schneider
  To: Michael Roberts ; Alexanian, Moorad ; Johan Jammart ; asa@calvin.edu ; Janice Matchett
  Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 11:54 AM
  Subject: Re: [asa] Physicalism and Incarnation

  Nor do I. "Bodily resurrection" does not entail the physical body of Jesus. That would be resuscitation, not resurrection. I believe that what the disciples experienced was the real presence of the risen Messiah, but read carefully 1 Cor. 15 to see how Paul wrestled with this matter.
  Bob
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Michael Roberts
    To: Alexanian, Moorad ; Johan Jammart ; asa@calvin.edu ; Janice Matchett
    Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 10:44 AM
    Subject: Re: [asa] Physicalism and Incarnation

    Like Bishop Tom Wright I do not believe in a physical resurrection.

    Michael

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Thu Mar 1 12:29:26 2007