Re: [asa] vapor canopy

From: Bill Hamilton <williamehamiltonjr@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu Feb 15 2007 - 12:21:42 EST

This brings to mind an issue I have heard about, but on't know the reasoning
involved. From time to time I've read that the earth would have be3en much too
hot to sustain human life under a vapor canopy. Is this because water vapor is
a greenhouse gas?

--- Ted Davis <TDavis@messiah.edu> wrote:

> Relative to the vapor canopy, I would not advise any intepreters to get into
> that. I have for years been in touch with someone who is doing very careful
> research on the history of that idea. I have urged him to publish his
> findings in PSCF, but so far he has not published any of it anywhere.
> Suffice it to say, the idea has a very checkered pedigree.....
>
> Ted
>
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
> "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
>

Bill Hamilton
William E. Hamilton, Jr., Ph.D.
248.652.4148 (home) 248.821.8156 (mobile)
"...If God is for us, who is against us?" Rom 8:31

 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Don't pick lemons.
See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos.
http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Thu Feb 15 12:22:11 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 15 2007 - 12:22:11 EST