Re: [asa] IPCC

At 09:31 AM 2/12/2007, Rich Blinne wrote:

>On Feb 11, 2007, at 8:36 PM, Janice Matchett wrote:
>
>>At 09:19 PM 2/11/2007, <mailto:Dawsonzhu@aol.com>Dawsonzhu@aol.com wrote:
>>
>>>I came across this recently. It doesn't say a whole lot, but the
>>>author is supposedly a former editor of the New Scientist.
>>>
>>>An experiment that hints we are wrong on climate change
>>><http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article1363818.ece>http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article1363818.ece
>>>
>>
>>@ It was posted by four different people on Free Republic.
>>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1782856/posts
>>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1782902/posts
>>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1782953/posts
>>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1783085/posts
>>
>>~ Janice ..... Is environmentalism the new
>>religion? http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1782539/posts?page=35#35
>
>Did anyone there mention this? Svensmark may be correct with
>respect to cloud condensation and GCR (galactic cosmic rays) but
>he's wrong about GCR having any significant effect on climate
>change. The problem with respect to GCR causing climate change is
>that it's trendless. GCR counts from Climax between 1950 and now
>show a trendless linear regression, i.e. p=0.477. Translation for
>layman, not statistically significant. So, how does a trendless GCR
>affect global temperature which is going up and to the right over
>the same period? Answer, it doesn't. As far as I can determine,
>Svensmark has not commented on the lack of trend in GCR. ~ Rich Blinne

@ @ You may find out some of what he commented on linked at #9 here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1781810/posts?page=9#9

In this thread:

February 12, 2007
Gobal Warming's .. Backers
http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/02/gobal_warmings_globalist_backe.html

~ Janice .... my comment is here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1781810/posts?page=25#25

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Mon Feb 12 13:26:13 2007