Re: [asa] Why the opposition to global warming

As you say, generalizations are too simplistic. Plenty of loons opposed to the environmental movement could be cited for unfair generalizations about the other side.

As to the 2d point, it's not simply a matter of "cuteness." Genuine conservatives, as distinguished from the current neo flock, know that government is supposed to do precisely the things which cannot be done by individuals. Without that awareness you end up with private armies &c. & while individuals can do some things about global warming, the notion that the problem can be dealt with entirely at that level is utterly unrealistic. That does not mean of course that it can be dealt with only by a totalitarian world government.

Shalom
George
http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: David Opderbeck
  To: George Murphy
  Cc: Bill Hamilton ; wdwllace@sympatico.ca ; Randy Isaac ; asa@calvin.edu ; Andy Bootsma
  Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2007 3:07 PM
  Subject: Re: [asa] Why the opposition to global warming

  the assumption that "the conservative movement" as a whole is
> "socialist, pantheistic and oppressive" is an overstatement at best.
   
  Well, generally, generalizations are too simplistic. But let's be real -- some very significant streams of the environmental movement tend towards socialism and a sort of pantheism. Don't forget Paul Ehrlich's environmentalist manifesto "The Population Bomb," with chapter titles such as "Too Many People," "Too Little Food" and "A Dying Planet" ( http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/1568495870/ref=sib_dp_pt/002-7169106-6605613#reader-link)

  What kind of world would we be living in today if Ehrlich had his way? One with domestic and international involuntary population control laws, which could include things like "sterilants" in the water supply ("The Population Bomb" at p. 130). The population control meme was a major tenet of environmental globalism until global warming took center stage. I think it's good for conservatives to remind us of this, before we hand over the keys to the government to a small number of knowledge elites, even if the global warming problem has a sounder scientific basis than Ehrlich's population theories.

  As to "conservatives" and "conservation," that's cute, but the fundamental principle of modern conservatism is that people should be free to govern themselves to the extent possible. A corollary to that principle is that inefficiency and corruption increase along with the size and power of a governing body. It's highly doubtful that global governance would do a better job at solving environmental problems. More likely, it would only produce more opportunities for inequality and graft. International cooperation and agreements are necessary, but international rule-making and enforcement bodies should be subjected to healthy skepticism.

  On 2/3/07, George Murphy <gmurphy@raex.com> wrote:
> 1st, >
> 2d, it's always seemed strange to me that so many "conservatives" are
> opposed to, or are at best lukewarm about, "conservation." I recall this
> point being made back around the beginnings of the environmental movement,
> ~1970, by James Buckley - Bill's brother - who had just been elected to the
> U.S. Senate from New York on the Conservative ticket (if you need any bona
> fides).
>
> Shalom
> George
> http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Hamilton" < williamehamiltonjr@yahoo.com>
> To: "David Opderbeck" <dopderbeck@gmail.com>; < wdwllace@sympatico.ca>
> Cc: "Randy Isaac" <randyisaac@comcast.net>; <asa@calvin.edu>; "Andy Bootsma"
> <bootsmaa@rogers.com>
> Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 8:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [asa] Why the opposition to global warming
>
>
> I agree with David. The scientists who are convinced that global warming is
> a
> serious problem (and I agree with David that it is a problem) need to
> distance
> themselves from the environmental movement, who have turned conservatives
> off
> with their socialist, pantheistic and oppressive government ways. If they
> will
> do that perhaps some intelligent discussion can take place, which will lead
> to
> real solutions.
>
> --- David Opderbeck <dopderbeck@gmail.com > wrote:
>
> > We've discussed this before, but I think you need to understand the
> > context
> > of the environmental movement to answer this question. The environmental
> > movement has made many doomsday predictions that have failed to
> > materialize,
> > the most notorious involving population control. Coupled with those
> > predictions, some leaders in the environmental movement have operated from
> > a
> > neo-pantheistic worldview and have made suggestions that smack of
> > totalitarianism -- again, population control being the most notorious
> > example. And, as to warming in particular, the most prominent policy
> > proposal, the Kyoto treaty, represents a massively costly global
> > regulatory
> > regime that impinges on state sovereignty and voter oversight -- thereby
> > weakining some basic building blocks of democratic governance.
> >
> > So, among conservatives of any stripe -- not just fundamentalist religious
> > conservatives, but also more serious economic and libertarian
> > conservatives
> > -- there is a deep suspicion of *any *suggestion that the world is facing
> > an
> > immanent, massive crisis that can be addressed only through world-wide
> > regulation. Personally, I think at least some of that skepticism is a good
> > thing, even if (as I believe) there is a very real problem that needs to
> > be
> > addressed in global warming. We need to find ways to address this problem
> > without sacrificing freedom and liberty, and the libertarian skeptical
> > voices at least remind us of that.
> >
> >
> > On 2/3/07, Dave Wallace <wdwllace@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> > >
> > > On your blog, Randy you ask "Why the opposition to global warming".
> > > Late yesterday and again this morning the online version of the National
> > > Post leads off with the headline
> > >
> > > The real deal?
> > > Against the grain: Some scientists deny global warming exists.
> > >
> > > With the experts on climate change weighing in, the Post talks to
> > > scientists who go against conventional...
> > >
> > > Further down they have:
> > > # Global warming likely caused by humans
> > > # Video: Suzuki reacts to climate report
> > >
> > > http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/index.html
> > >
> > > The National IMHO is Canada's best paper which is not saying a lot. We
> > > used to have much better news papers, however, they have gone down hill
> > > in the last ten to twenty years. Too many do not seem to be able to
> > > tell the difference between news and editorials.
> > >
> > > The ten part series they write starts out at:
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/story.html?id=c6a32614-f906-4597-993d-f181196a6d71&k=0
> > >
> > > If people read just the headlines let alone some of the lead articles
> > > and the above series it appears that climate warming is not well
> > > supported, at least the human causation factor. David Suzuki might
> > > convince people otherwise, however, some people will say that if Suzuki
> > > thinks global warming is real then it must be at best marginal or even a
> > > hoax. IMHO he has cried wulf too many times.
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
> > > "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > David W. Opderbeck
> > Web: http://www.davidopderbeck.com
> > Blog: http://www.davidopderbeck.com/throughaglass.html
> > MySpace (Music): http://www.myspace.com/davidbecke
> >
>
>
> Bill Hamilton
> William E. Hamilton, Jr., Ph.D.
> 248.652.4148 (home) 248.821.8156 (mobile)
> "...If God is for us, who is against us?" Rom 8:31
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Finding fabulous fares is fun.
> Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and
> hotel bargains.
> http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
> "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
>
>

  --
  David W. Opderbeck
  Web: http://www.davidopderbeck.com
  Blog: http://www.davidopderbeck.com/throughaglass.html
  MySpace (Music): http://www.myspace.com/davidbecke

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sun Feb 4 17:47:13 2007