Re: [asa] Glenn's views

I reviewed one of Glenn's books in multiple versions before he released it.
Glenn IMO is trying to preserved insofar as possible a literal interpretation
of Scripture, while trying to be faithful to what is known about archaeology
and geology. This may seem like an impossible task to many of you, but
   Glenn has amassed a tremendous volume of information, much of which can be
interpreted to support his thesis. I am not totally comfortable with his
conclusions, but I respect his scholarship.
--- "burgytwo@juno.com" <burgytwo@juno.com> wrote:

> Michael observed: "I think people who misuse Job like that make
> mockery of the bible and ifind it offensive as well as risible.
> however it is because of the literalist mindset many evangelicals
> have and if I can say it gently both Glenn and Dick hold on to it."
>
> I can't speak for either of these gentlemen, but I have interacted
> with Glenn over many years and edited one of his books. I think you
> misunderstand his position.
>
> Burgy
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
> "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
>

Bill Hamilton
William E. Hamilton, Jr., Ph.D.
248.652.4148 (home) 248.821.8156 (mobile)
"...If God is for us, who is against us?" Rom 8:31

 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know.
Ask your question on www.Answers.yahoo.com

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Thu Jan 11 22:58:41 2007