See below:
-- James Mahaffy (mahaffy@dordt.edu) Phone: 712 722-6279 498 4th Ave NE Biology Department FAX : 712 722-1198 Dordt College, Sioux Center IA 51250-1697 >>> On 12/7/2006 at 4:44 AM, in message <008901c719f1$2742a400$6df4cdd9@D9D1ZJ1J>, "Michael Roberts" <michael.andrea.r@ukonline.co.uk> wrote: > This is a very wise post and I agree with what you say. > > To list the problems of ID; > 1. Political posing of Wells Johnson > 2. Inaccurate content of writings by Wells and Johnson in particular. There > is an honesty question here. > 3. Refusal to come clean on the age of the earth > 4 Willingness to associate too closely with YEC > 5 (weaker) association with Right Wing agenda and weak on the environment > 6 Tendency to be god of the gaps > 7 Tendency to be offensive to TEs > > Points 1 and 2 are the most serious and remove all credibility from ID. > > Because of this I do not take any ID arguments seriously > > Michael Michael, Please. It is posts like this that made me start the thread. May I still consider you a brother in Christ and someone whose opinion I should sometimes listen to in spite of the fact that: 1. the Anglican church has some problems 2. I might not agree with everyone in your congregation (are any of them YEC). 3. Britain has a parliamentary system of government. If you can object to ID because some are right wing, this is fair. I am sorry but I still associate also with some brothers in Christ that are YEC. Maybe I feel for why they take their position. I am saddened when you make the following statement: > Points 1 and 2 are the most serious and remove all credibility from ID. > > Because of this I do not take any ID arguments seriously You would categorize all ID folks including Behe and Dembski in the same camp because you don't like Johnson or Wells. I know I will run into both of you and Behe in heaven although neither of you is Christian Reformed. Dembski's wife was Dutch so I had use Behe. To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.Received on Thu Dec 7 12:41:44 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Dec 07 2006 - 12:41:44 EST