PvM wrote:
From 1995 onwards Behe's CV looks unimpressive, even his more extensive CV
shows no evidence of publications before 1995. So let's dig deeper: Until 1995
he was a professor of Chemistry and switched to Biochemistry in 1995. Perhaps
Behe's CV shows how scientifically unfruitful the concept of Intelligent
Design really is.
-- Looking at the list you show, I don't find his research unimpressive up to 1995. Typically, until you have enough grants to support an army of students, you're lucky if you can publish a couple of papers a year in biology. If they don't appear important to you, well, that's your opinion but that is all it is. On your last point, scientists can also get stuck somewhere on some idea. Sometimes they turn out to be right, other times, they just pursue a path that leads nowhere. Some of them are very competent scientists: Hoyle comes to mind. I think that says more about how we should be careful. IIRR, DBB came out around 95 or 96. Probably the biggest problem here is that the ID movement turned to using the judicial system to force the teaching of ID. If, for the sake of example, Hoyle had tried something like that, probably similar things as you write above would have been expressed about him too. by Grace we proceed, Wayne To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.Received on Fri, 1 Dec 2006 20:50:49 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 20:51:57 EST