You seem to be misunderstanding my position. I am pointing out that
even if these scientific findings are true there are no reasons for
us Christians to be worried. Should God be constrained to be relevant
only where he is essential or should He be seen as in charge of His
Creation including the evolutionary parts?
Indeed, science cannot address these questions which is why they can
be harmonized.
On Nov 1, 2006, at 2:20 AM, Gregory Arago wrote:
> "Each their own beliefs. / Superfluous merely means that God is not
> necessary but that does not mean that God was not involved. Is that
> not what causes so much concern when people believe that Darwinism
> has made God irrelevant when in fact all that it could possibly do
> is show that God is superfluous. Nothing prevents God from playing
> a role." -PvM
>
> The issue of not caring whether God cares for God's creation is,
> however, a sad condition for a Christian believer to resort to. It
> seems awfully generous of Pim to *allow for the possibility* that
> God just might play a role. The fact that Pim actually believes God
> does 'play a role' shows that his science and faith are rigidly
> compartmentalized instead of acting in harmony seeking unison.
>
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Wed Nov 1 12:02:15 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 12:02:15 EST