Re: [asa] A parable of three investors

From: Don Nield <d.nield@auckland.ac.nz>
Date: Sun Oct 29 2006 - 23:10:14 EST

Glenn Morton wrote:

> I actually have come to disagree with the concept that the intent of
> the original author (or more correctly his understanding) is
> important. If it

>is, then clearly we can't change the interpretation. What that guy believed
>is what we must believe, no matter how stupid that is. Since I believe in a
>strong form of inspiration, in which God inspired the writings to tell us
>something of a concrete nature, then it is His intent which is important,
>not the understanding or intent of the original Hebrew writer.
>
>This view that the original intent of the Hebrew writer is what has made the
>status quo so bad. It limits our choices and makes it impossible to actually
>come up with a solution.
>
>
My question to Glenn is the following. If God inspired the writings to
tell us something of a concrete nature, why is it not set in more solid
concrete?
Don

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sun Oct 29 23:11:01 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Oct 29 2006 - 23:11:01 EST