Re: [asa] Re: asa-digest V1 #6228

From: <Dawsonzhu@aol.com>
Date: Wed Oct 18 2006 - 21:59:00 EDT

> (B.T.W. this may have been addressed in another thread I've forgotten, but
> does
> anyone know why Elihu alone among Job's friends was not singled out for
> repentance? If we put Elihu's exhortations next to those of Bildad, Eliphaz
> &
> Co., could anyone tell the difference?)
>

Elihu's argument seems to center on the righteousness of God
33:12-13
[12] But I tell you, in this you are not right, for God is greater than man.
[13] Why do you complain to him that he answers none of man's words?

34:10-13
[10] So listen to me, you men of understanding, Far be it from God to do
evil, from the Almighty to do wrong.
[11] He repays a man for what he has done; he brings upon him what his
conduct deserves
[12] It is unthinkable that God would do wrong, that the almighty would
pervert justice.
[13] Who appointed him over the earth? Why put him in charge of the whole
world?

I tended to read verse 34:11 as though Elihu is repeating the same
refrain as his friends, but in context, Elihu does imply that he will not
raise the same assertions (32:12- "...but not one of you has proved
Job wrong; none of you has answered his arguments."). So
maybe the way to read this is something like the following.

(1) A general statement about God's judgment, not aimed directly
at Job himself.
(2) God's ultimate judgment at the end of the age when everything
is laid out, whereupon Job will receive his reward.

The main issue is that Job was tending toward trying to
condemn God to justify himself.

by Grace we proceed,
Wayne

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Wed Oct 18 21:59:59 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Oct 18 2006 - 21:59:59 EDT