Re: [asa] On Job

Absolutely , there is no historicity in Job, but it is still the best thing
in the OT on suffering

Michael
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carol or John Burgeson" <burgytwo@juno.com>
To: <asa@calvin.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 2:37 PM
Subject: [asa] On Job

> Vernon commented: "Can such passages as Job 1:6-12 =
> and 2:1-7 be 'interpreted' to mean something different from their =
> account of actual meetings, actual discussions and actual consequences?
> =
> And if, in your view they must be accepted as real events, what might we
> =
> usefully glean from them?"
>
> The most reasonable interpretation of Job is that it is a morality play.
> To consider it as sober factual history is ludicrous. Sort of like
> believing ALICE IN WONDERLAND.
>
> Burgy
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
> "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
>

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Wed Oct 4 11:27:50 2006