[asa] Interesting review of "The Selfish Gene"

I just came across this rather heart-rending review of "The Selfish Gene"
from the Amazon.com web-site (the first review on the list), illustrating
the devastating effect it had on one reader. He gave the book 5 stars (the
best rating). Much of what he writes touches very closely with the
science/faith interface - and the book has left this reader quite confused
and depressed.

I just hope this reader will read Francis Collins to get a different
perspective! (Or Allister McGrath on Dawkins, for that matter).

Iain

______

*Fascinating, but at times I wish I could unread it.*, August 7, 1999
I wish I could rate this book at 5 stars and 0 stars at the same time. It is
a fascinating book, very well-written, and it conveys a real sense of how
life works on the biological level, how all sorts of diverse factors
interact with each other to create an incredibly complex system (the
evolution of life, in this case); it also just as vividly conveys a sense of
how scientists come to understand these processes.

I started it many years ago at the suggestion of a friend, thinking I
wouldn't find it very interesting, and not much liking the kind of
philosophy of life that (on the basis of my friend's description) seemed to
lie behind it. But only a chapter or two in, I was completely hooked, and
wanted to read more Dawkins.

On one level, I can share in the sense of wonder Dawkins so evidently sees
in the workings-out of such complex processes, often made up of quite simple
elemental mechanisms, but interacting so complexly to produce the incredibly
complex world we live in.

But at the same time, I largely blame "The Selfish Gene" for a series of
bouts of depression I suffered from for more than a decade, and part of me
wants to rate the book at zero stars for its effect on my life. Never sure
of my spiritual outlook on life, but trying to find something deeper -
trying to believe, but not quite being able to - I found that this book just
about blew away any vague ideas I had along these lines, and prevented them
from coalescing any further. This created quite a strong personal crisis for
me some years ago.

The book renders a God or supreme power of any sort quite superfluous for
the purpose of accounting for the way the world is, and the way life is. It
accounts for the nature of life, and for human nature, only too well,
whereas most religions or spiritual outlooks raise problems that have to be
got around. It presents an appallingly pessimistic view of human nature, and
makes life seem utterly pointless; yet I cannot present any arguments to
refute its point of view. I still try to have some kind of spiritual
outlook, but it is definitely battered, and I have not yet overcome the
effects of this book on me.

Richard Dawkins seems to have the idea that religion and spirituality are
not only false, but ultimately unable to give a real sense of meaning and
purpose in life. Their satisfaction is hollow, empty, and unreal, in his
apparent view, and only a scientific understanding of life can give a real,
lasting sense of wonder and purpose.

I would question this. While I am not sure what (if anything) there is
spiritually, I know that a scientific view of life cannot offer the
slightest hope of life after death, and since we're all going to die and
most of us don't want to, this is a crippling drawback to the kind of
scientific vision Dawkins wants us all to have. If there is nothing beyond
death, no spiritual dimension to anything, and everything is just a blind
dance of atoms, I fail to see how this by itself can give one a real sense
of purpose, however fascinating the dance that Dawkins describes - and it
*is* fascinating; let there be no mistake about that.

Because of this, I have the curious feeling of dichotomy about Dawkins' book
that it is certainly fascinating on one level, but that I cannot give even
qualified emotional commitment to the outlook on life that seems to lie
behind it. I would in the end rather have the hope of something wonderful
and purposeful that only some spiritual outlook can offer, even though it
may be a deluded fantasy, than the certainty of a scientific vision that
eliminates any possibility of long-term hope, that condemns us to an empty,
eternal death of nothingness in the end. This scientific view may be
completely rational; but rationality is not the only important consideration
to shape our outlook on life.

Anyone who has a narrow religious view of life, who is absolutely sure their
religion is completely right, would be best off avoiding this book like the
plague - it probably won't change their views, but they will quite likely
get very upset and outraged. And anyone with an open-minded spiritual view
had better at least be prepared to do a lot of thinking, and perhaps be
willing to change some of their views, because this book *will* challenge
almost any spiritual or religious viewpoint I can think of - whether it is
of the open-minded or dogmatic sort.

Some critics of this book have found its reasoning unconvincing, its
materialist reductionism too superficial and shallow. But, from my
perspective, the problem does not lie here; the problem with the book is
that it is *too* convincing, that it is *entirely* convincing. The book
makes it very difficult to continue to believe in anything that contradicts
its basic premise, but which might be more comforting, and might give a
greater sense of hope and inspiration, and provide a real sense of purpose
in life.

Such have its effects on my life been that, in my more depressed moments, I
have desperately wished I could unread the book, and continue life from
where I left off.
It has been said that each of us has a God-shaped hole inside, and that we
spend most of our lives trying to fill it with the wrong things. I firmly
believe that God-shaped hole is there, that we have inner longings of a
wonderful sort almost impossible to describe in words. Whether a God exists
to fill it, I do not yet know. But what I am sure of is that, as wonderful
as Dawkins' view of nature and of life may be on its own level, it will not
fill that God-shaped hole.

-- 
-----------
After the game, the King and the pawn go back in the same box.
- Italian Proverb
-----------
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.