Re: [asa] AIG gets it wrong again

>
> I can see some problems with it, such as: saying this is the "earliest
> sign
> of humans in Europe" may be completely unfactual; or it may be a temporary
> conclusion, pending new discoveries of earlier sites; or it may represent
> the fact that Neandertals came into this area from somewhere else with
> already-developed technological skills, which negates the YEC-presumed
> significance of the find.

Yes, this part is also wrong, as the oldest currently known human remains in
Europe are much before Neanderthals (e.g., H. erectus in Georgia).

-- 
> Dr. David Campbell
> 425 Scientific Collections
> University of Alabama
> "I think of my happy condition, surrounded by acres of clams"
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.