Re: [asa] Quoting Darwin out of context

<<Dawkins continues the grand theme of this chapter leading to the
inevitable conclusion that there is at bottom no evidence of design in
the universe at all, just blind pitiless indifference, and an amount
of suffering that goes beyond decent contemplation, which is a natural
consequence of the way things are.>>

Assuming this is an accurate representation of Dawkins, is he not
contradicting himself? If there is JUST blind PITILESSNESS in the universe,
how can there be "decent comtemplation"?

Paul S
 

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sat Aug 5 13:41:31 2006