On 7/19/06, RFaussette@aol.com <RFaussette@aol.com> wrote:
>
> In a message dated 7/19/2006 3:16:18 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> rich.blinne@gmail.com writes:
>
> George put it better than I could. Perhaps this could be a piece of common
> ground. Rich?
>
> Rich,
>
> These ideas I fight hard to defend are part of a paradigm that interlocks.
> Because the whole paradigm works and I've argued it effectively in so many
> venues and am now published with some of the world's leading
> paleoconservatives on these subjects, I defend them vigorously, so it's not
> that I am being intentionally difficult by refusing to compromise, I have to
> sustain the paradigm because of its explanatory potential. I'm trying to
> share something important that is part of that interlocking understanding.
>
>
I was merely trying to avoid being a contrarian as George rightly noted a
nugget of truth in what you were saying. You claim that this paradigm
interlocks. If you do not allow me to separate out the parts that have merit
from the parts that do not then all the numerous internal inconsistencies
keep me from giving any part of what you say any more serious consideration.
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Wed Jul 19 18:43:47 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jul 19 2006 - 18:43:48 EDT