Re: [asa] Coulter, and science

From: Iain Strachan <igd.strachan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon Jul 10 2006 - 10:34:47 EDT

On 7/10/06, Alexanian, Moorad <alexanian@uncw.edu> wrote:
>
> Would you say that bestiality is "natural" or "unnatural?" This is what
> is natural, "And He answered and said, "Have you not read that He who
> created them from the beginning MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE, and said, 'FOR
> THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER AND BE JOINED TO HIS
> WIFE, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH'? So they are no longer two, but
> one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate."
> Mathew 19:4-6.
>

Moorad,

What on earth has bestiality got to do with it??????

When *ever* in my posts here, did I mention bestiality?

Please do not sidetrack the argument by dragging in irrelevancies.

As to the text you quoted, I notice the biblical text doesn't say "This is
what is natural", that's what the author on the internet site you quoted
interpolated. If we take him at his word, then it's unnatural to remain
single. Try telling that to many of my friends who, through no choice of
their own, have not found a partner. And of course, all those Roman
Catholic priests ....

Iain

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Mon Jul 10 10:35:33 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jul 10 2006 - 10:35:33 EDT