Re: [asa] Re: ??

I think it is generalizing the specifics here that is a problem.
Conflation of some separable issues seems to be part of the discussion
difficulty. JimA

RFaussette@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 6/15/2006 10:50:37 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> burgytwo@juno.com writes:
>
> Rich wrote:
>
> >>Homosexuality can be attractive to young men, not because
> > they are born with a gay gene and can't help themselves but
> because of
> > their male sexual drive. Homosexuality, if legitimized, is easily
> > introduced to young men who engage opportunistically. They can be
> > subborned and trained to the behavior if they're caught at the
> right
> > time. >.
>
> If factual, this is a good argument. (I think it is not, but my
> opinion
> could change).
>
> Is there any evidence at all (scientific, not anecdotal) that it is
> factual?
>
> Burgy
>
> Burgy,
>
> Yes, NAMBLA, which is trying to legitmize homsexual relationships
> between boys and men.
> There's organizational proof.
>
> The Catholic Church's homosexual scandal. It is a scandal and has
> resulted in widepsread deflowering of young men by homosexuals.
>
> Another well documented organizational issue.
>
> The life and death of Montgomery Clift.
>
> Is there any evidence AT ALL? I am flabbergasted that even with a
> liberal leaning you can respond as if you could be oblivious to these
> "proofs."
>
> rich faussette
>
>
>
>
>

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Thu Jun 15 14:11:40 2006