RE: In defense of Paul Seely

Hi Glenn, you wrote:
 
>>My view actually has a flood that ACTUALLY HAPPENED as opposed to the Mesopotamian self-delusion. My flood can last a year without incredibly special or miraculous circumstances. Unlike views recently discussed here, I don't have to ignore the coriollis force, have special winds, water flowing uphill (amazing that adults
beleive that!). I don't even have to have miracles. And I don't have to to believe
in a totally mythical/non-existant Mesopotamian flood which has zero evidence of
its occurrence just like the YEC flood y'all disdain so much.<<
 
Are there any flaws in your theory? H’mmm, let me think … Well, your flood happened millions of years before there was any single living human being on the face of the earth! I would consider that a limitation. Your flood can't get an ark above sea level let alone to any mountains. Your flood is no where near Ararat.
 
How good were Australopithicines at building massive water-tight vessels? How would you explain Australopitihcines raising crops and livestock 5 million years before actual humans thought of it? Did Australopitihcines play stringed musical instruments and make tools out of bronze and iron? Show us some evidence of that dear friend. Then criticize us for a Mesopotamian flood for which you have seen an abundance of historical evidence in addition to layers of water-laid clay deposits found in the central Mesopotamian cities by archaeologists.
 
Do you really forget everything you don’t like, or am I reading a replay of the same conversation we had over ten years ago?
 
Dick Fischer
Dick Fischer, Genesis Proclaimed Association
Finding Harmony in Bible, Science, and History
www.genesisproclaimed.org
 
 
 
Received on Sat Jun 10 15:06:53 2006