On Fri, 9 Jun 2006 09:06:18 -0500
"Tjalle T Vandergraaf" <ttveiv@mts.net> wrote:
>> IHMO, once the state severs its relationship with
>traditional
> Judeo-Christian values, all best are off and the any
>future decisions will
> be based on the will of the majority and that will lead
>us into uncharted
> waters. >
> Chuck Vandergraaf
Hasnt this already happened? Is there any argument
against same sex marriage that is not a religious
argument? How can the state enforce a religious view on
someone that does not hold that view?
If we still held Judeo-Christian values as a society,
abortion wouldnt be the issue that it is. And there are
more non-religious arguements against abortion than there
are against same sex unions it seems to me.
This is why I think there is a distinction between
marriage in a civil sense, and in a religious sense.
Jack
Received on Fri Jun 9 11:42:05 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jun 09 2006 - 11:42:05 EDT