Charles Austerberry wrote:
"...I am not convinced that the Book of Mormon is an historically honest
document, let alone an historically accurate document. The Bible, however,
is consistently honest..."
What would be your definition (and distinction) of historical honesty vs.
accuracy, and how would one show that one document is or isn't?
Jon Tandy
Received on Thu Jun 8 19:04:25 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jun 08 2006 - 19:04:25 EDT