At 12:24 PM 5/22/2006, Rich Blinne wrote:
>On 5/22/06, Janice Matchett <janmatch@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>>At 08:23 AM 5/22/2006, Rich Blinne wrote:
>>
>>On 5/21/06, Janice Matchett <janmatch@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> At 02:46 PM 5/21/2006, Rich Blinne wrote:
>>
>>
>>Rich: "...I have been going back and forth with Janice about the importance
>>of not imputing motives."
>>
>> @ That's news to me.
>>
>> What did I say in this "back and forth" with you on that subject?
>>
>>Rich: If you don't recall what you said you can check the archives here:
>>http://www.calvin.edu/archive/asa/
>>@@ Not even once did I engage with you on the subject of "imputing motives",
>>so it's impossible for me to "recall" things I never said.
>>
>>So if you continue to insist I engaged in a "back and forth" with you on the
>>subject, it's incumbent upon you to provide the referenced quotes, or
>>retract your -- (I'll be charitable here) -- "misleading" statements.
>
>Rich: "...yes, it is true that not once did you engage with me on
>the subject of imputing motives ... It does not mean, however, I
>didn't raise the issue multiple times. I now see that this really
>isn't back and forth because you were non-responsive. So, I
>publically retract going "back and forth" with you on the subject.
@@ Thank you. ~ Janice .. who knows what "it does not mean, however".
Received on Mon May 22 12:39:44 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 22 2006 - 12:39:44 EDT