At 05:08 PM 5/19/2006, Rich Blinne wrote:
>On 5/19/06, Janice Matchett <janmatch@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>>At 03:00 PM 5/18/2006, Rich Blinne wrote:
>>
>>On 5/18/06, Janice Matchett <janmatch@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>>At 12:17 PM 5/18/2006, Michael Roberts wrote:
>>
>>Has any Republican ever committed adultery or fornication?
>>
>>@ Not the right question.
>>
>>The right question is this, "When Republicans commit sin, do their
>>constituents consider it as an enhancement to their resume` for election to
>>high office?"
>>
>>
>>Rich: "Yes. One such sin being bearing false witness against their
>>neighbor when their neighbor is a Democrat or even worse a RINO.
>>@ Be specific.
>Rich: "Sure. First let's have an exposition of what violates the
>commandment. ..."
@@ No. Notice again what the subject is: the constituents' opinion.
You must [1] provide specific examples of Republican candidates lying
(exact quotes, sourced and dated), and then [2] show your specific
proof that their constituents viewed their lies as a positive thing.
> Rich: "...I will not give specific examples here because to do so
> would be to fall into the same sin that I am discussing."
@@ Tee hee.
>Rich: This is not a Republican problem nor a Democrat problem.
>This is a fallen human problem.
@@ And as the quintessential example of a one-armed-boat-rower, you
have circled us back to what I wrote in the FIRST place:
The right question is this, "__When__ Republicans commit sin, do
their constituents consider it as an enhancement to their resume` for
election to high office?"
Okay if I hop out of your boat now?
~ Janice
Received on Fri May 19 18:03:01 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri May 19 2006 - 18:03:01 EDT