Re: Aig's weekly meaasag

On Wed, 17 May 2006 20:10:21 -0400 "George Murphy" <gmurphy@raex.com>
writes:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tjalle T Vandergraaf" <ttveiv@mts.net>
> To: "'Carol or John Burgeson'" <burgytwo@juno.com>;
> <asa@calvin.edu>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:58 PM
> Subject: RE: Aig's weekly meaasag
>
>
> >I wonder how one portrays a happy dinosaur. Would it smile or wag
> its
> >tail?
>
> The actual happy dinosaur would be the one that had eaten the boy.
>
> Shalom
> George
> http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/
>
>
Please, George, eating the boy only happened with the second set of
dinosaurs, the ones after the fall with blood dripping from their teeth.
The prefall dinosaur would be both smiling and wagging its tail, which
would knock down and kill trees and any small creatures in the trees,
which would be impossible before the fall. But dino would be vegetarian,
only to change at the time of the fall so that Noah would have the
problem of segregating the carnivores. You need to keep the
contradictions in mind at all times. But remember that God produces
miracles so that p and not-p occur simultaneously.
Dave
Received on Thu May 18 00:59:59 2006