Re: Things that don't evolve

Actually, we brits miss out entirely on Pi day as there are only 30 days in
April :-(

Iain

On 3/14/06, Michael Roberts <michael.andrea.r@ukonline.co.uk> wrote:
>
> It cant be , today is 14/3
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Robert Schneider <rjschn39@bellsouth.net>
> *To:* Alexanian, Moorad <alexanian@uncw.edu> ; Janice Matchett<janmatch@earthlink.net>; Chris
> Barden <chris.barden@gmail.com> ; Gregory Arago <gregoryarago@yahoo.ca>
> *Cc:* ASA list <asa@calvin.edu>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 14, 2006 3:21 PM
> *Subject:* Re: Things that don't evolve
>
> Today, 3.14, is "Pi Day"!
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Alexanian, Moorad <alexanian@uncw.edu>
> *To:* Janice Matchett <janmatch@earthlink.net> ; Chris Barden<chris.barden@gmail.com>; Gregory
> Arago <gregoryarago@yahoo.ca>
> *Cc:* ASA list <asa@calvin.edu>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 14, 2006 9:37 AM
> *Subject:* RE: Things that don't evolve
>
> All aspects of the physical universe are evolving. Irreversibility is
> the name of the game! However, nonphysical concepts, e.g., the
> transcendental number pi, are not aspects of the physical universe. The very
> existence of death is the very presence of an evolving scenario for all
> living organisms. He who solves the problem of life will simultaneously
> solve the problem of death.
>
>
>
> Moorad
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu] *On
> Behalf Of *Janice Matchett
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 14, 2006 8:33 AM
> *To:* Chris Barden; Gregory Arago
> *Cc:* ASA list
> *Subject:* Re: Things that don't evolve
>
>
>
> At 08:05 AM 3/14/2006, Chris Barden wrote:
>
> Mathematical constants and static formulae come to mind.. I don't
> believe I've ever heard anyone mention "mathematical evolution".
>
> It's important, I think, to distinguish between evolutions that have
> or are thought to have scientific mechanisms to explain them
> (biological, planetary, galactic, etc.) and mere rhetorical
> "evolution" that just means "somebody read this, and did this other
> thing, which got somebody else thinking about this new technology".
> Unless all progress is to be considered social evolution... a "theory
> of everything" must have some weight behind it for it to be any more
> than a tautology.
>
>
>
> @ I googled this question to see what I'd come up with. ~ Janice
>
> Google Results *1* - *10* of about *2,110,000* for *evolution*<http://www.google.com/url?sa=X&oi=dict&q=http://www.answers.com/evolution%26r%3D67>
> * is the singularity<http://www.google.com/url?sa=X&oi=dict&q=http://www.answers.com/singularity%26r%3D67>
> ?*.
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=evolution+is+the+singularity%3F
>
>

--
-----------
After the game, the King and the pawn go back in the same box.
- Italian Proverb
-----------