Re: Things that don't evolve

At 08:05 AM 3/14/2006, Chris Barden wrote:
>Mathematical constants and static formulae come to mind.. I don't
>believe I've ever heard anyone mention "mathematical evolution".
>
>It's important, I think, to distinguish between evolutions that have
>or are thought to have scientific mechanisms to explain them
>(biological, planetary, galactic, etc.) and mere rhetorical
>"evolution" that just means "somebody read this, and did this other
>thing, which got somebody else thinking about this new technology".
>Unless all progress is to be considered social evolution... a "theory
>of everything" must have some weight behind it for it to be any more
>than a tautology.

@ I googled this question to see what I'd come up with. ~ Janice

Google Results 1 - 10 of about 2,110,000 for
<http://www.google.com//url?sa=X&oi=dict&q=http://www.answers.com/evolution%26r%3D67>evolution
is the
<http://www.google.com//url?sa=X&oi=dict&q=http://www.answers.com/singularity%26r%3D67>singularity?.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=evolution+is+the+singularity%3F
Received on Tue Mar 14 08:32:48 2006