Re: National Geographic article

I just read what I could from the National Geographic website regarding this
article. It appears that it is about mtDNA and Y chromosome DNA. Genetic
analysis using DNA from these two sources has consistently supported the OAA
theory. It is the autosomal DNA, as in Templeton's analysis, that is
contrary to the mtDNA and Y chromosome DNA. I dont have the entire article,
but what is on the website looks like it is nothing new.

I hope I am not mistaken, but didnt Glenn say something about unsubscribing
in a post the other day? I dont recall if I have seen a post from him
since. I was not sure what he meant by that comment.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Terry M. Gray" <grayt@lamar.colostate.edu>
To: <asa@calvin.edu>
Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 10:48 AM
Subject: National Geographic article

> Have we heard Glenn's comments about the article in the latest (March
> 2006) issue of National Geographic on human genetics in support of an out
> of Africa perspective? No discussion of how it relates to the Biblical
> accounts, of course. There's some interesting fairly definitive claims
> there about the lack of interbreeding between pre- modern and modern
> populations (at least with respect to Neanderthal).
>
> TG
>
> ________________
> Terry M. Gray, Ph.D.
> Computer Support Scientist
> Chemistry Department
> Colorado State University
> Fort Collins, CO 80523
> (o) 970-491-7003 (f) 970-491-1801
>
>
Received on Sun Mar 12 11:27:07 2006