Re: What Bible?

Debbie Mann wrote:

> ..... Yes, there needs to be a standard. But what is the basis of the
> standard? So far, I have not found one. I am currently listening to the
> course, 'Lost Christianities' by Bart Ehrman.
>
> What is the standard? Where is it written?
>
> Debbie Mann
> (765) 477-1776
>
>
If somebody produced the basis for the standard, then that basis would
itself become the new standard, and the focus of investigations would
shift to that, beginning the cycle of questioning all over again.
--Why should that be the standard? - what make us sure it is true?
etc. At some point faith is required. The current canon is accepted
as 'the standard' by much of Christendom but of course, that isn't proof
of anything. I don't think your question will have a satisfying
answer, if asked as one who demands proof, or even just empirical
evidence. But if one accepts an answer (faith involved), they can then
see if that answer stands up to the experiences of life. It's been
said somewhere: "some things have to be believed to be seen". Perhaps
that saying was expressed as a flippant mockery of 'gullible'
believers. But if so, it has unintended truth in it.

I haven't read or studied some of the writings you mentioned (other than
the gospel of Thomas). I probably won't have time to read all such
things, which is why commentary from those of you who have would be very
enlightening (to me). 'Lost Christianities' sounds interesting
too. I finished Pagel's work and I think I have a fair grasp of her
position now.

--merv
Received on Sun Mar 12 09:30:10 2006