*Let's start over. As far as I am concerned, if someone can answer my
quesitons about the problems I see for the Mesopotamian flood, I would be
delighted. I want to actually hear answers from anyone, geologist or not,
which actually addressed the problems.
*
I agree, and thank you. Could you help me out with this: I see you always
referencing a flood in the North. If I understand correctly, this is
because of the reference to the ark landing on Mt. Ararat. If we could set
that aside for a moment, just to understand the geology better, in the am I
right that there's nothing to preclude large-scale floods in the south of
Mesopotamia -- maybe a large river flood that could have washed a big
boat out into the Gulf? Is the problem you're presenting re: the geology
primarily a problem with lack of evidence for a huge flood in the north of
Mesopotamia that lands the ark on Mt. Ararat?
On 3/10/06, glennmorton@entouch.net <glennmorton@entouch.net> wrote:
>
>
> David wrote:
>
> >>>To all: I want to apologize for the shouting match below. I do
> acknlowedge Glenn's superior expertise to mine, and I genuinely am trying to
> test different views. <<
>
> Well, I wish I could get back that email I just sent 2 second ago. Look, I
> don't like the arguing anymore than anyone else. Obviously I am a troubled
> old man who has seen too much and wishes I hadn't. LIfe was so much simpler
> as a YEC. I didn't have to worry about reality and what the data says about
> the Biblical story. Geology tends to be a very atheistic endeavor because
> of the Biblical account of the flood and the questions I have raised.
>
> Let's start over. As far as I am concerned, if someone can answer my
> quesitons about the problems I see for the Mesopotamian flood, I would be
> delighted. I want to actually hear answers from anyone, geologist or not,
> which actually addressed the problems.
>
>
>
Received on Fri Mar 10 09:33:53 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Mar 10 2006 - 09:33:53 EST