I don't think I would define it so narrowly. Special creation presumes an
act of God outside ordinary processes. There could still be a genetic link.
On 3/4/06, Dick Fischer <dickfischer@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> Special creation presumes no genetic links between species. Anything
> "specially created" has no mum or dad.
>
>
>
> Dick Fischer
>
> ~Dick Fischer~ Genesis Proclaimed Association
>
> Finding Harmony in Bible, Science, and History
>
> www.genesisproclaimed.org
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu] *On
> Behalf Of *Michael Roberts
> *Sent:* Saturday, March 04, 2006 3:01 PM
> *To:* jack syme; glennmorton@entouch.net; asa@calvin.edu
> *Subject:* Re: Special Creation
>
>
>
> What's the difference between creation and special creation? What does God
> do differently in special creation?
>
>
>
> I am happy with a God who creates and thus all He creates is special.
>
>
>
> Michael
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> *From:* jack syme <drsyme@cablespeed.com>
>
> *To:* glennmorton@entouch.net ; asa@calvin.edu
>
> *Sent:* Saturday, March 04, 2006 12:44 PM
>
> *Subject:* Re: Special Creation
>
>
>
> No special creation in the physical sense. But there has to be something
> unique about mankind, something that seperates us from animals; the "imagio
> dei."
>
> But I will give you this, in a sense the main difference between us is
> the source of hte DNA. So, why is yours so much better? Scientifically the
> most likely explanation is that there was no miracle, no ape to resurrect,
> and we are simply evolved from the apes--no special creation at all.
>
>
Received on Sat Mar 4 16:48:41 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Mar 04 2006 - 16:48:41 EST