glen wrote
There is absolutely nothing in the Plio-pleistocene that even remotely matches a flood as described by the Bible. The latest is the infilling of the Med and that actually would begin to sound a bit like the Biblical flood. IMO, there is little reason to remain literal believing in Adam and Eve if one has no flood. One might as well go allegorical/accomodationalist all the way to Genesis 12.
That's your only solution Glenn, it is better than stretching genesis like an elastic band as Adam Sedwick said in 1858.
Received on Thu Mar 2 09:30:24 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 02 2006 - 09:30:24 EST