Dalrymple's paper is excellent. H e sent me a draft before publication which I used a lot. It is a good background to rate
Michael
----- Original Message -----
From: Stephen Meyers
To: asa@calvin.edu
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 3:47 PM
Subject: Debate 2 & other news
"THE GREAT DEBATE" (Part 2)
Mr. Ken Ham and Dr Jason Lisle (representing young Earth creationists) debate Dr Hugh Ross and Dr Walter Kaiser (representing old Earth creationists) present their views and answer YOUR questions. Part 2 of an 8 part series is now online at http://www.ankerberg.com/
Chimps 'closer to humans than apes' CHIMPANZEES may be more closely related to human beings than they are to other apes, US researchers have reported. Writing in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, scientists at the Georgia Institute of Technology said they found genetic evidence that chimpanzees might be more closely related to humans than to gorillas and orang-utans. See http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticleSearch.aspx?storyID=296181+23-Jan-2006+RTRS
How Old is the Earth: A Response to "Scientific" Creationism. A classic and often-referenced 1984 paper by G. Brent Dalrymple. The paper contains short but accurate expositions of radiometric dating methods and discussions of creationist criticisms and attempts to date the Earth as young. It includes material difficult to find elsewhere, such as the discussion of mixing isochrons and the effect of neutron-capture reactions. Now online at http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/dalrymple/how_old_earth.html
Sincerely,
Stephen Meyers
www.bibleandscience.com
Received on Tue Jan 24 13:14:32 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 24 2006 - 13:14:48 EST