Pim wrote:
> So far I have yet to see my hypothetical example addressed such as
> teaching evolution as a religion. As the hypothetical examples have
> shown, the existence of a legitimate secular purpose is highly relevant.
>
But there are no buildings and no doctrines as such in the traditional
sense. That evolution __can be__ a religion, is certainly the argument
that Ruse points out, and for __some__ people, it clearly sticks. But that's
just it, it is individual people; and I doubt they are present in most any
K-12
schools where this whole issue is raised. Individuals can be disciplined on
other grounds. But I say this with much fear and trembling, because,
unfortunately, justice is rarely even handed in this world.
by Grace we proceed,
Wayne
Received on Sun Jan 8 22:04:05 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Jan 08 2006 - 22:04:05 EST