Re: Judge Jones sided with the Discovery Institute and ruled against the Dove...

David Opderbeck wrote:

> Sigh. I'm not sure what else I can do here, you're back to not
> getting it again. Why would my first scenario lack a valid secular
> purpose? There's no "religious" purpose at all in my first scenario.

See
"The Court's search for a valid, bona fide secular purpose, also
suggests the conclusion that the concurrence in Edwards in fact draws:
"If no valid secular purpose can be identified, then the statute
violates the Establishment Clause."45"

If no valid secular purpose can be found, then the establishment clause
has been violated...
Received on Thu Jan 5 12:44:04 2006