Re: Judge Jones sided with the Discovery Institute and ruled against the Dove...

Pim Van Meurs wrote:

> May in inquire as to why it is dangerous for the courts to try to define
> science? What if the issue of whether something is a science were
> central to the question of constitutionality?
>
>

If issues of science end up in the courts, that is already very bad news.

In Northern California at least, judges are elected. Let's say a YEC
activist judge is there in Eurika, and this case is brought there. Will
you trust the judicial system to do justice now if the case is about
science? Move a few steps back on the chess board and think about
it.

We should be deeply grateful to the Lord for his quite protection;
that a W appointed judge in a creationist town did a commendable and
honest job defining science on a matter that should never have even
appeared in his court. But just because we were rescued by Grace
this time, don't conclude you're an Abraham and can risk your wife
again at Gerar (Gen 20). The court should be the last place where
science is decided.

By Grace alone we proceed,
Wayne
Received on Sun Jan 1 20:38:10 2006