Re: Judge Jones' decision

I'd be interested in Cornelius' legal analysis of the decision as to the issues of overreaching and committing fallacious claims.
Judge Jones's decision reads as well informed. That the discovery institute has to refer to his decision as 'activist' shows how well argued the decision must have been.
Just check out the DI's blogsite to hear how they deal with the decision (it's not pretty but it may help understand them better).
 
Pim

----- Original Message ----
From: Cornelius Hunter <ghunter2099@sbcglobal.net>
To: Ted Davis <tdavis@messiah.edu>; asa@lists.calvin.edu
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 1:22:24 PM
Subject: Re: Judge Jones' decision

Well you've got your work cut out for you. This decision is over reaching
and committed to fallacious claims. One could spend quite some time
dissecting it. This is not the first time that the legal process has so
degraded. I think the service you could do Ted would be to show how easily a
legal decision can go off the deep end. The warfare thesis now has the legal
stamp of approval.
Received on Tue Dec 20 20:22:50 2005