Re: Another heresy

John,

It disappoints me that the 'divine watermark' - to which I repeatedly draw
attention - has, so far, signally failed to deter those who insist on
reading their own meaning into the words of the J-C Scriptures. However,
those few who correctly perceive the implications of this miraculous event
(encountered in the opening Hebrew words) realise that such practice is now
no longer reasonable; that the Bible is confirmed as a unique body of
_divine revelation_ - and an implacable foe of evolution.

By the way, robust argument should not be interpreted as incivility,
impertinence or personal malice. ASA, surely, is a forum for grown-ups -
and one in which plain speaking is encouraged.

Vernon
www.otherbiblecode.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Carol or John Burgeson" <burgytwo@juno.com>
To: <asa@lists.calvin.edu>
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 3:25 PM
Subject: Another heresy

> Vernon wrote, in part, replying to Bob:
>
> .. (1) Apparently you doubt the Lord's veracity and sincerity in respect
> of the
> parable recorded in Luke 16:19-31. ... As a person 'like that' what,
> precisely, don't I get?"
>
> Among the many things I perceive you "not getting" is a civil tongue. Bob
> may be incorrect in his position (I seriously doubt that he is) but in no
> way would that incorrectness (if it were so) imply that he doubts the
> Lord's veracity. For you to imply this is simply being impolite.
>
> JB
>
> What does Michael Ruse say about C vs E in his latest book.
>
> See www.burgy.50megs.ruse.htm for a review.
>
>
>
Received on Sat Dec 10 17:16:42 2005