> So, we can reject that the vatican accepted ID via
> Schoenborn. Thus the real standard is the papal
> statement which clearly supports evolution. In fact,
> the recent statement made by the cardinal, in support
> of religious faith and science, clearly outlines the
> confusion of Schoenborn, namely the conflation of
> randomness with purposeless.
>
> A common creationist confusion it seems. Science
> cannot address 'purpose' in this case, one way or
> another.
It's not exclusively their fault-it's a common atheistic confusion,
too.
-- Dr. David Campbell 425 Scientific Collections Building Department of Biological Sciences Biodiversity and Systematics University of Alabama, Box 870345 Tuscaloosa AL 35487-0345 USAReceived on Wed Nov 9 11:16:10 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Nov 09 2005 - 11:16:11 EST