Peer review and ID

From: Pim van Meurs <pimvanmeurs@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed Oct 19 2005 - 23:16:36 EDT

The ACLU-PA blog provides us with some interesting items
http://aclupa.blogspot.com/2005/10/all-part-of-scientific-process-part-1.html
 
On the issue of peer review and Black Box, Behe insisted that the peer review was real and more rigorous. One of the 'reviewers' was Professor Atichison who wrote an article in which he describes his involvement in peer reviewing DBB
 
[quote]The editor shared his concerns with his wife. His wife was a student in my class. She advised her husband to give me a call. So, unaware of all this, I received a phone call from the publisher in New York. We spent approximately 10 minutes on the phone. After hearing a description of the work, I suggested that the editor should seriously consider publishing the manuscript...It sounded like this Behe fellow might have some good ideas, although I could not be certain since I had never seen the manuscript. We hung up and I never thought about it again. At least until two years later.[/quote]
 
Received on Wed Oct 19 23:17:39 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Oct 19 2005 - 23:17:39 EDT