Cornelius wrote:
Actually, IDs do not "say that some phenomena are due to direct divine
action." What they say is that one way or another we can infer design.
The
design we infer may have gotten there by secondary causes.
Like snowflakes. So, if the Big Bang is an example of a primary cause,
and the Creator caused it to happen, and all that follows the
singularity is the result of secondary causes then this is TE not ID.
This would make Howard Van Till an ID proponent. He'd gag. Then why
talk about flagellums?
~Dick Fischer~ Genesis Proclaimed Association
Finding Harmony in Bible, Science, and History
www.genesisproclaimed.org
Received on Fri Oct 14 18:14:20 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Oct 14 2005 - 18:14:20 EDT