RE: Who Was Adam

Janice wrote:
 
A review of this new book for those interested. ~ Janice
 
It's like reading a review of Mein Kampf by Rudolph Hess.
 
This comes from the "reviewer's" web page:
"The claim has been made that ID has no place in science and is never
used in the study of science. This is not true. In fact, all of the
following areas of science use evidence of ID as the major or sole means
of study. Even though the designer is not a supernatural agent, but
intelligent humans, the principles involved in studying these areas of
science can be applied to the study of supernatural ID.
1. Archeology: Is that rock formation natural or due to intelligent
design?
2. Anthropology: Do sharp, pointed rocks occur naturally or are
they designed by intelligent beings?
3. Forensics: Intelligent cause of death or natural circumstances?
4. SETI: Are those radio signals natural or caused by intelligent
beings?
ID is already used in many areas of science. In archeology, we know that
stones don't naturally occur in square shapes piled on top of each
other. They show signs of intelligent design (although the designer is
not supernatural).
Yeah, yeah, watch on the beach and all that.
 
Want to know who will win the Notre Dame - USC game? Ask the cheer
leaders.
 
PS: Want to know more about Adam than Ross and Rana know? Read my
articles:
 
http://www.asa3.org/ASA/topics/Evolution/PSCF12-93Fisher.html
 
http://www.asa3.org/ASA/topics/Evolution/PSCF3-94Fisher.html
 
~Dick Fischer~ Genesis Proclaimed Association
Finding Harmony in Bible, Science, and History
www.genesisproclaimed.org
Received on Sat Oct 8 18:50:14 2005