Re: What goes around comes around

Pim:

> your still avoiding that the 'epicycles' are not ad hoc applied but are in
> fact tested for. After all, why should a few minor puzzles lead one to
> reject the science of evolution, which stands quite strongly by itself?

Actually, most epicycles for evolution are not tested for.

The fact of evolution has not been established from science. Yet this is the
claim. When evolutionists explain why they think this is true, they use
religious arguments. Much like the ones that Darwin used. And much like ones
that were used before Darwin. What we need are scientific arguments and
evidences that pass the test of science.

--C
Received on Fri Oct 7 22:28:22 2005