Re: Viewpoint discrimination or careless reading.

From: Michael Roberts <michael.andrea.r@ukonline.co.uk>
Date: Thu Oct 06 2005 - 13:55:42 EDT

I can't remember, but some contributors to Pandasthumb cant distinguish
between Fine tuning and ID, so that means both Polkinghorne and Peacocke are
ID!

Michael
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ted Davis" <tdavis@messiah.edu>
To: <asa@calvin.edu>; <michael.andrea.r@ukonline.co.uk>;
<pimvanmeurs@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 6:43 PM
Subject: Re: Viewpoint discrimination or careless reading.

>>>> "Michael Roberts" <michael.andrea.r@ukonline.co.uk> 10/06/05 12:46 PM
>>>>writes:
> There
> was a post on Pandasthumb casting doubt on Owen Gingerich's scientific
> credibility due to his Christian faith.
>
> Ted wonders:
> What, exactly, was the issue? Let me hazard a guess... Owen has a talk
> he likes to give on college campuses, called "Dare A Scientist Believe in
> Design?" and his answer is (shh, someone might be listening) Yes.
>
> Was that this issue?
>
> ted
>
>
>
Received on Thu Oct 6 15:45:09 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Oct 06 2005 - 15:45:09 EDT