Re: It's the Bible or evolution

From: Preston Garrison <garrisonp@uthscsa.edu>
Date: Thu Oct 06 2005 - 01:47:41 EDT

Ted:
>>For evolution, he gave several such
>>examples, esp the recent discovery of pseudogenes in identical locations for
>>humans and some other primates--a "fact" that favors the "theory" of
>>evolution
>
>Cornelius: It does *not* favor evolution.
>
>over a theory of a common design plan, since the genes have no
>>known functions and thus a designer would have no reason to give them to all
>>of these organisms.
>>
>>ted

Cornelius,

What is your basis for saying this? The countless examples of
transposed elements in exactly the same position (and same type,
orientation, etc.) in different mammalian genomes seems to me one of
the strongest sets of evidence for common descent. I gathered earlier
that you reject all this evidence, but I don't know what your
alternative explanation for the phenomenon is. I have not been
following things closely, being up to my eyebrows in grant writing
recently.

Preston G.
Received on Thu Oct 6 01:50:46 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Oct 06 2005 - 01:50:46 EDT