Re: [Bulk] Re: The Pseudo-Science Amicus Brief in Kitzmiller

At 01:45 PM 10/5/2005, Pim van Meurs wrote:
>janice matchett wrote:
>
>> At 02:45 AM 10/5/2005, Pim van Meurs wrote:
>>
>>Tim Sandefur has written about the recent Amicus brief filed by 85
>>scientists in the Kitzmiller case. The brief can be read here
>>http://scit.us/kitz/kitz-dibrief.pdf
>><http://scit.us/kitz/kitz-dibrief.pdf%A0%A0%A0> I have read the brief and
>>am appalled by the many errors in the brief. ..." [snip]
>>
>>~ Pim
>>
>>### If serious scientists hope to regain credibility it would be in
>>their best interest to distance themselves from people who are promoted
>>by *infidels.org* and other web sites promoting atheistic religious
>>philosophies.
>>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1496881/posts?page=96#96
>
>I assume you similarly consider promoting religious philosophies of any
>kind to be a reason to distantiate oneself from the arguments
>presented? Janice, your 'arguments' are self defeating and miss the point.
>In Christ
>Pim

#2#2# The complaint of serious scientists is that most people perceive
them to be promoting atheism. That perception is reinforced when people
notice who they are using as spokespeople in their defense. That's just
the way it is. Sorry.

~ Janice
Received on Wed Oct 5 14:04:14 2005