Re: The Dover trial

From: George Murphy <gmurphy@raex.com>
Date: Mon Oct 03 2005 - 20:09:27 EDT

----- Original Message -----
From: "Pim van Meurs" <pimvanmeurs@yahoo.com>
To: "asa" <asa@calvin.edu>
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: The Dover trial

> This is getting more and more confusing. Not teaching ID and yet we hear
> how Dover did insist on teaching ID?
>
> For instance Dembski observes that:
>
> "Unfortunately, members of the Dover school board have, through their
> actions, conflated ID with an apparent religious agenda."

This is a rather amusing observation for those who have read Dembski's book
_Intelligent Design_ (IVP, 1999). Chapter 1 is "Recognizing the Divine
Finger" and contains a section titled "The Sign of the Resurrection." & his
version of ID doesn't have a religious agenda?

Shalom
George
http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/
Received on Mon Oct 3 20:11:35 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 03 2005 - 20:11:35 EDT