Short point from Phil Skell

From: Ted Davis <tdavis@messiah.edu>
Date: Thu Sep 22 2005 - 13:31:53 EDT

Phil's latest point:

Why has the Nobel Committee not substituted the category Evolutionism for
the merely derivative mundane applications of it that are described in
Physiology/Medicine?
Phil
Received on Thu Sep 22 13:35:01 2005

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Cornelius Hunter: "Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?"
Previous message: Pim van Meurs: "Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 22 2005 - 13:35:01 EDT